Click here for advertising info 

 
    Home  •   News  •   Forums  •   Chatroom (0)  •   Gallery  •   Reviews  •   Shopping  •   Gig Listings  •   Jukebox  •   Advertising  
 Username : Password :     
 
You are not a registered member of Norwich Darkside yet!

Until you register, you will not be able to reply to posts, or start new topics! The Norwich Darkside forums are the best place in Norfolk to get exposure for your band, find all the latest music news and reviews, share your experiences of local gigs, and become a member of the biggest music community in East Anglia.
Registration is free, quick and will also remove this annoying box!Register Now
Forum Index » General Discussion » let's start a controversial thread - Student Fee nonsense

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 let's start a controversial thread - Student Fee nonsense
Author Message
smoother-narration
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:37 pm  Reply with quote

Darkside Roadie
Darkside Roadie

Joined: Feb 27, 2008
Posts: 247


Luke_Vanguard wrote:
smoother-narration wrote:
This forum really is full of middle-aged metal heads who play too much D&G.


....Dolce and Gabbana?


Ha! My bad, now it just looks more homophobic as far as rants go. D&D (dungeons and dragons).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clydefrog
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:16 pm  Reply with quote

Darkside Supporter
Darkside Supporter

Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 4509
Location: The Rock Boudoir


Premium Member

smoother-narration wrote:
This forum really is full of middle-aged metal heads who play too much D&G.

Ah the old "I'll stop now and not reply to anyone's discussions properly because I really have no idea what I'm on about, and instead make random sweeping generalisations with no basis whatsoever, so I look all *edgy*".

If I had a pound every time someone did that, I could pay for you to go to university.
_________________
End%20Soteria
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
smoother-narration
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:53 pm  Reply with quote

Darkside Roadie
Darkside Roadie

Joined: Feb 27, 2008
Posts: 247


clydefrog wrote:
smoother-narration wrote:
This forum really is full of middle-aged metal heads who play too much D&G.

Ah the old "I'll stop now and not reply to anyone's discussions properly because I really have no idea what I'm on about, and instead make random sweeping generalisations with no basis whatsoever, so I look all *edgy*".

If I had a pound every time someone did that, I could pay for you to go to university.


Hmmm... You're a smart guy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slobdog
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:18 am  Reply with quote

Darkside Rock Star
Darkside Rock Star

Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 1477
Location: near nottingham


david_frank wrote:
the people who worked hard at uni and got high paid jobs will be subsidising those who dossed around and ended up working at Starbucks won't they? Is that fair? Regardless of the merits (or lack of them) of increasing tuition fees


I don't think the hard working camp will be too bothered about the dossers. Sure they may note that they'll end up paying for their debt, but they will probably be more focused on their own achievements?

I hope that this is the beginning of a real improvement in HE. I'd like to think that this will reduce numbers and drive he pointless degrees (the media studies / martial arts theory etc.) back to the FE college and evening class hobby status that they deserve. I shudder at the thought of making them accelerated '2 year degrees'. They should be called diploma's or certificates - why maintain the overclassified status these 'degree's' currently have?

I would like to think that instead of being subsidised to faff about at uni, school leavers will be subsidised in a work place, ideally on an apprenticeship scheme. Ideally these apprenticeships would allow the participant to transfer companies, if desired, in order to get a wider experience of working. Such schemes aren't without difficulties, companies would need to be 'forced' to not take too much advantage of the cheap labour (they will always take some advantage!).

There would also need to be an aceptance that the minimum wage is unrealistic in such schemes.......this is a training scheme.....not a job....and being 'paid' £60-70 / week for say the first year is realsistically what you would need to accept.

These are the types of opportunity I would like my Daughter to have in 16 years time. If she's very bright/driven and picks a worthwhile challenge, then I'm sure we'll help her through uni, but if it's no different from today, then she can damn well work!
_________________
slobbysoft (TM) - "Turning sexual assault into a legitimate business"
www.myspace.com/slobdog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Luke_Vanguard
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:31 am  Reply with quote

Darkside Rock Star
Darkside Rock Star

Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Posts: 1184
Location: London


slobdog wrote:
david_frank wrote:
the people who worked hard at uni and got high paid jobs will be subsidising those who dossed around and ended up working at Starbucks won't they? Is that fair? Regardless of the merits (or lack of them) of increasing tuition fees


There would also need to be an aceptance that the minimum wage is unrealistic in such schemes.......this is a training scheme.....not a job....and being 'paid' £60-70 / week for say the first year is realsistically what you would need to accept.


It'd be nice to see this money redirected from the useless EMA scheme. Bribing kids to stay at school is a cheap and typically Labour way of trying to achieve the stupid 50% HE statistic that should never have existed in the first place. I did my A levels at school and worked at Tesco for my £60 a week when I was 16, and I still got straight A's so no excuses!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slobdog
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:11 am  Reply with quote

Darkside Rock Star
Darkside Rock Star

Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 1477
Location: near nottingham


Luke_Vanguard wrote:

It'd be nice to see this money redirected from the useless EMA scheme. Bribing kids to stay at school is a cheap and typically Labour way of trying to achieve the stupid 50% HE statistic that should never have existed in the first place. I did my A levels at school and worked at Tesco for my £60 a week when I was 16, and I still got straight A's so no excuses!


Agreed about the EMA being useless. It gives kids an easy path to a lazy start in life.....early habits are difficult to shift, which is why a part time job is so good for teenagers. During 6th form, I worked P/T on a farm, which gave me some pennies and taught me how to escape from mad bulls and write off brand new ride on lawn mowers! Priceless skills!

For funding an apprentice type scheme, I think the employers would need to stump up the up front money. The government subsidy element would come through tax incentives - i.e. no N.I and some form of contribution to college courses/evening classes would be more likely.
_________________
slobbysoft (TM) - "Turning sexual assault into a legitimate business"
www.myspace.com/slobdog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suicide_silence
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:56 am  Reply with quote

Darkside Band Tech
Darkside Band Tech

Joined: Oct 02, 2006
Posts: 470
Location: Norwich


you should be in parliament slobby.... Very Happy
_________________
gettin dem bare tonez.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
slobdog
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:16 pm  Reply with quote

Darkside Rock Star
Darkside Rock Star

Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 1477
Location: near nottingham


suicide_silence wrote:
you should be in parliament slobby.... Very Happy


It would make for interesting question time.....

"Would the right 'onerable cunt off please explain why his twattish proposals are so shit and ignore the pressing matter of loading Gordon Brown and John Prescott into a giant cannon and firing them at the moon. Not only is this a suitable punishment for their crimes against the country, it is a vital climate change experiment, where we test the hypothesis of using their huge body masses to make it rain cheese carbonate!"

*ensue lots of cheering and wah wah noises*
_________________
slobbysoft (TM) - "Turning sexual assault into a legitimate business"
www.myspace.com/slobdog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
claire
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 8:13 pm  Reply with quote

Darkside Strumpet

Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 754
Location: shitsville


degrees are still affordable for everyone, if you study part time with the Open University there are still grants to cover course fees if you are on a low income..... and if not it would only work out at £700 per year for 6 years, thats not a lot of debt even if you need to borrow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Page 5 of 5

Forum Index » General Discussion » let's start a controversial thread - Student Fee nonsense
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.04 Seconds
 
 
Advertise with us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Contact Darkside -